On Sun, Jun 09, 2019 at 09:04:01AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Sun, Jun 09, 2019 at 05:18:20PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote: > >Err, Gene, this foop has swelled to 1.2 million lines of code while your > >back was turned. Pervasiveness is its essence. > > > >https://linux.slashdot.org/story/19/05/25/0538206/systemd-now-has-more-than-12-million-lines-of-code > > Is that a lot, for an init system? Or for an init system + the other systems > that are in the systemd source tree (syslog equivalent, udev, etc.)? If so, > what > would be an "appropriate" quantity of source code?
What's much? What's little? This was just a typical useless anti-systemd slur: 12 million lines of code! Wow! (and it carries along a negative judgement without really saying it, so plausibly deniable). Way to stir up mud in the discussion without really contributing anything valuable. For whatever reasons I don't understand. I tend to ignore such things. And if that sounded like a systemd proponent: I still run stretch *without* systemd. I don't like its approach. But I like less the discussion style which has developed around it. We're running in circles, it seems. Cheers -- t
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
