On Tuesday 09 December 2003 09:46, John L. Fjellstad wrote: > Yeah, I figured that out after looking at the dependency list of > the kernel-packages. I'm wondering though if using gcc3.3 would > have any impact (since everything else on the stable system would > have the programs compiled with gcc2.95)
Well, that's what I've been thinking. But isn't the kernel basically
one self-contained unit? I mean sure: The modules depend on the
kernel but they're both compiled with the same compiler anyway,
right?
Apart from that: The kernel is pure C, isn't it? The changees from
gcc2.95 to gcc3.2 were in the C++ ABI, they didn't affect C
compatibility IIRC. So it really doesn't make much sense to have any
unresolved symbols here - and, as I said, at least for me it worked.
Anyways, I'm really no expert on this. But it's been really
interesting to discuss it - always something to learn on this list!
Best regards,
Magnus
--
--- Magnus von Koeller ---
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
address: International University
Campus 9, App. 13
D-76646 Bruchsal / Germany
phone: +49-7251-700-659
mobile: +49-179-4562940
web: http://www.vonkoeller.de
pgp00000.pgp
Description: signature
