to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > That would be a fatal mistake, indeed. But there's another hurdle, > which is not to be subestimated. Emacs, as an old program, comes > along with an old culture, with its own lispeltongue (i.e. "point" > instead of "cursor", "window" for "sub-frame", etc.). It takes a > while to understand that it's totally worh it to embrace this mysterious > language/culture.
exactly - learning emacs means learning lisp - what for? I switched years ago to ne.
