Gene Heskett wrote: > On Friday 04 January 2019 13:31:05 Nicolas George wrote: > >> deloptes (12019-01-04): >> >We just pointed out >> > that you do not have to be a sysadmin to operate a computer. >> >> And you are wrong. Operating a computer requires a sysadmin, there is >> no way around it. If there is no dedicated one, that makes the user >> the sysadmin. Their choice whether they become competent or not; >> >> Regards, > > Another demonstration of TANSTAAFL Nicolas. Its a law one will obey no > matter how hard you try to ignore it. > > Cheers, Gene Heskett
It requires sysadmin as far as a car requires a mechanic, but you could always go to the shop and buy new one. What I wanted to point out is that it is not a requirement per se for the operation of the device. You are mixing both. For the present case OP is acting as sysadmin - nothing wrong, so your point is clear, but you mistakenly presume that one should play the same role. It is not a must. It is a matter of choice and skills. Even for the car, I can repair most of it if I am skilled and have the manual, but I do not have to. regards
