On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 09:05:54AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote: [...]
> It demonstrates the problem of Linux's jargon[1].
Linux's jargon has no problems ;-)
> That file has 32 entries. Only 2 are relate to my problem ["richard"
> & "root"].
How would you know? Perhaps the other 30 users are busy keeping
your system running smoothly?
> Who is "owner" {more jargon} of specific files &/or
> directories. What is needed the concept of something similar to
> Intellectual Property.
No. More similar to access rights.
> I started trying to restate my problem unambiguously.
> While looking for some local concrete examples I think I thought of
> another line of attack on my problem. My homework assignment for to
> day is "Investigate further" ;/
How 'bout you take advice seriously and just do an "ls -l" on one of
those files you think you would like to have access to and post the
results. Then we can continue to debug from there on. Would that be
a proposal?
Cheers
-- tomás
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
