rhkramer writes:
> Yeah, but I wasn't thinking about actually using a CRT to display the
> signal in real time, but, instead, collect samples (at maybe 4 GHz??),
> store them, and then display them as a static display.

At that sort of frequency sampling scopes (including the old crt ones)
sample at far below the signal repitition rate.
-- 
John Hasler 
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA

Reply via email to