On Fri 07 Dec 2018 at 10:08:35 (+0000), Joe wrote: > On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 23:05:24 -0500 Celejar <cele...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 08:59:25 +0000 Ben Oliver <b...@bfoliver.com> wrote: > > > On 18-11-26 21:12:19, Celejar wrote: > > > >On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 09:37:21 -0500 Mark Neidorff <m...@neidorff.com> > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > >... > > > > > > > >> Now, I don't like the webmail interfaces and the limited storage > > > >> for old > > > > > > > >Limited storage? Who - big or small player - offers unlimited > > > >storage for old emails? > > > > > > > > > > My suggestion [0] (a 'small' player) does! > > > > > > [0] https://www.migadu.com/ > > > > Very interesting, thanks. I notice that they say "Storage is not your > > problem, it is ours." [0] We trust you will not abuse it." What does > > "abuse" mean in this context? That it shouldn't be used for file > > storage? > > > > [0] https://www.migadu.com/en/benefits.html#anchor_storage > > Some people keep a) all their old email, which is a perfectly > reasonable thing to do, and b) leave all the attachments in, which is > also perfectly reasonable to do on your own storage. > > I used to deal with a client who did this and who received a *lot* of > attachments. I had to fix his broken [Exchange] mailbox a couple of > times, and it was *enormous*. Exchange mailboxes seem to take an amount > of time to fix that is an exponential function of their size, they are > basically MS Access databases.
OTOH they may feel that uploading all your backups etc is unreasonable, perhaps including workarounds like mailing them to yourself. Cheers, David.
