to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > This is, btw, the counter-argument posed here by conservatives wrt. > reducing the carbon footprint: "But China". They don't know what they are > talking about.
well given the capacity of a blue ray I still would need plenty of them to copy the relevant data, (not in tar.xx format) so that I reduce risk of corruption (see prev. post) and this carbon footprint is really stupid argument I would not like to start with. Don't know who are "they" but I definitely agree with you. So I conclude the only advantage is the argument with blocks lost vs. whole device crippled. Hence the question who does produce valuable disks nowdays. I noticed 2001 CDs Platinum were better than 2004. regards
