On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Stefan K <shado...@gmx.net> wrote: > In the beginning of btrfs, most blogs, websites, magazins said btrfs will be > THE next standard linux filesystem, so now after araound 10years it doesn't > look so good, or? > > Who use btrfs in production? What do you think - does have btrfs a feature > (because ZFS on Linux is more and more stable, RedHat said we don't want > btrfs anymore and focus to xfs) > > I use btrfs on some new bare-metal machines for the root-disks, because it > has a build-in RAID1 and snapshots, I know LVM and md-raid have also this > possibilities but in btrfs it is much easier. I don't use it for data or > other things(mail, database, etc), cause it is slow compared to ext4/xfs. I'm > also wondering why the hell btrfs don't support ssd's for caching like zfs.
Before people start discussing *features*, note that OP uses the mostly non-standard spelling "feature" when he means "future".
