-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 08:39:28PM +0100, Brian wrote:
[...] > If a package is upgraded, surely a user would want any new packages > to be installed if they are required to satisfy dependencies. apt's > designed behaviour looks more sensible than apt-get's. False dichotomy. More "newbie friendly" maybe. And that is what it was made for. For an experienced user, perhaps apt-get's behavior makes more sense. Of course, it seems somewhat unfortunate that both apt and apt-get use the same subcommand name for slightly different things. Cheers - -- tomás -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlsOS9MACgkQBcgs9XrR2kafVgCggfwFc3aCiDTVfbsmxB4JXwvA etcAnA41FTjMt3Vde9QA5nYcrGXHMybw =5SVQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
