Le 25/05/2018 à 21:33, Joe a écrit : >> Le 19/05/2018 à 21:03, Hans a écrit : >>> Isn't it today "apt update" and "apt full-upgrade"? >> Thanks, I didn't know this new "full-upgrade" command. >> >> Is "apt full-upgrade" equivalent to "apt-get dist-upgrade" (or apt >> dist-upgrade)?
> More or less. Apt-get is actually a bit less intelligent, but in the > case of upgrades of very large numbers of packages (400+), that seems to > work better. It has been recommended for several version upgrades in > preference to aptitude. > > I haven't used apt, but I've used aptitude to upgrade long-neglected > unstable installations, and I've known it to run overnight without > finding a solution. > > For smaller numbers of packages, aptitude (and presumably apt) is > generally quicker at reaching a solution, apt-get may have to be run a > few times with selected packages to break an impasse. I don't use aptitude. I use only apt and apt-get but I believe apt is just a shortcut for apt-get. `apt update` is equivalent for me to `apt-get update` and `apt dist-upgrade` to `apt-get dist-upgrade` (correct me if I am wrong). My question was if apt (or apt-get) dist-upgrade was equivalent of apt (or apt-get) full-upgrade?
