Abdullah Ramazanoğlu wrote: > On Thu, 24 May 2018 11:04:51 -0000 (UTC) Dan Purgert said: > >> Ew, CGNAT. :( >> >> If you have a particularly poor ISP, they may even NAT you somewhere >> insane outside of RFC1918 (10.0.0.0 - 10.255.255.255 / 172.16.0.0 - >> 172.31.255.255 / 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255) or RFC6598 (100.64.0.0 - >> 100.127.255.255) space. > > Since RFC1918 and RFC6598 reserved addresses you mentioned are free (as in > lunch) to use, an ISP violating them in their internal cloud must be > really poor of clues, rather than of finances.
Yep, "poor as in bad", rather than "poor as in a pauper". -- |_|O|_| Registered Linux user #585947 |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
