On Fri, 11 May 2018 11:06:54 -0400 Dan Ritter <d...@randomstring.org> wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 07:55:24PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote: > > On Thu, 10 May 2018 13:00:27 -0400 "Stephen P. Molnar" > > <s.mol...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 05/10/2018 11:13 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:07:43AM -0400, Stephen P. Molnar > > > > wrote: > > > >> I've encountered a strange problem with the latest release of > > > >> Firefox Quantum v-60.0. > > > >> > > > >> Up to this point the previous versions, the 59.x.x, series had > > > >> been very happily residing in /opt/firefox. I uncompressed the > > > >> downlo9aded file as a user and thee copied the firefox > > > >> directory tree as root > > > >> > > > >> I did the upgrade exactly the same way, but now when I try > > > >> opening firefox I get: > > > >> > > > >> comp@AbNormal:/opt/firefox$ ./firefox > > > > That should be firefox not /firefox. > > No, Stephen changed to a particular directory and wants to make > sure that the firefox executable in this directory is run. > > ./firefox is correct. > > firefox by itself would search the PATH, and no proper PATH > includes ".", although his might include "/opt/firefox". Sorry. I didn't see the "dot" before the slash. I use a texted based email client, and the "dot" is very small, only one pixel. Just missed it. With the "dot," of course, the line is correct. B
