-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 03:44:23PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
[...] > That said, it is always safe to break valid "modified UTF-8" into > records using zeroes, as long as you don't expect the result to be valid > UTF-8 (it isn't valid UTF-8 because NULs will be encoded using a > non-minimal byte sequence that *will* decode to a zero even if it is > invalid) or valid modified UTF-8 (it isn't valid modified UTF-8 because > 0 is not valid as an encoding for NUL in modified UTF-8). But a lax > UTF-8 or modified UTF-8 *would* parse "modified UTF-8 with zero as > record separators" and reconstruct the unicode text properly (but it > would read the record separators as NULs, so you'd get extra NULs in the > resulting text). You are a nasty guy, aren't you ;-) Pretty cunning... Cheers - -- t -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlrFJngACgkQBcgs9XrR2kZqLgCdEuap+rqSU6HCrXpkL6XHl3Az lRUAnjwGhiMNNlY+SXwIxpd/kfnvst1z =kHBa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
