On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 13:57:07 -0800 Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 06:35:05AM -0600, Hoyt Bailey wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 03:00:13PM -0500, Paul Morgan wrote: > > > >> "Reports that say that something hasn't happened are always > > > >interesting> to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; > > > >there are things we> know we know. We also know there are known > > > >unknowns; that is to say we> know there are some things we do not > > > >know. But there are also unknown> unknowns - the ones we don't > > > >know we don't know."> > > > >> - Donald Rumsfeld, US Secretary of Defense, Winner of British > > > >Plain> English Campaign's 2003 "Foot in Mouth" award. > > > > > > > > Why doesn't this statement make sense? > > > > > > It does but he left out another term > > unknowable unknowns = sq. root of your encripted password in a base > > 100 system. > > Hoyt > > Actually for symmetry I was looking for the unknown knowns :-) He > covered the other three combinations. > > Let's see, what's something I know but I don't know that I know? > > <grin> > There is nothing obscure here. This is just the manifestation of a career CIA mentality torturing itself. Regards,
David. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
