on Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 09:16:15AM -0500, Greg Folkert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 02:03, Paul Johnson wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 04:16:44PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote: > > > On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 14:12, Alex Malinovich wrote: > > > > I'm afraid I'm part of the group that just doesn't understand. This > > > > snippet reeks of security through obscurity for me. If the hole has been > > > > identified and, presumably, fixed, why not tell people about it? > > > > > > DMCA. Nuff said. > > > > Expand, please? This is the digital equivalent of the classic > > for-the-children bullshit copout, or the more contemporary (and > > hopefully temporary) "homeland security" bullshit copout. > > DMCA sort of states: It is illegal to subvert any kind of "protection" > to keep you out of things or publish the information on how-to do > this... should you live in the USA.
Good point. Though the text of the statute is sufficiently vague that
defining an operating system as "copyright protection system" is
debatable.
> If you want more info, I'll cut and paste the relevant parts of the
> DMCA. Come on, with the way Lexmark sued "replacement cartridge"
> manufactures because the toner cartridge uses "electronic measures" to
> communicate to the printer... Geez, is it *so* hard to understand this
> perverseness things can come to?
Lexmark lost that one, fortunately. Not without a lot of trouble.
http://www.arstechnica.com/archive/news/1067455401.html
> Again, if more info is needed, I'll be happy to Cut'n'Paste the relevant
> parts.
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/1201.html
Peace.
--
Karsten M. Self <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
There is no K5 Cabal: http://www.kuro5hin.org/
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
