-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 09:38:47AM -0600, David Wright wrote: > On Wed 10 Jan 2018 at 10:46:43 (+0100), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[text, yeah!] > > But for me, (La)TeX *are* text :-) > > Yes, you can put me in the text camp, and a little further over > than you, I believe [...] Phew! I'm not alone, it seems :) [...] > But that's very different from suggesting feeding the raw file to > fooLaTeX and seeing what comes out of the other end. Different, too, > from saying that if it happens to be valid LaTeX code, process it > and print the output instead. The latter might produce And to be fair, results can be pretty exciting, depending on the actual file content... I would go with a2ps, too, btw. Downside is that it does the panoramic tour via PS and thus generates fairly hefty PDFs. Cheers - -- t -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlpWO5UACgkQBcgs9XrR2kYkdACffVJuo+aQoDqLeQ0Y9ZsNYuwU Ph8An2SrNW/ovzzbDsKoLfnGBfy2rBFh =Juy8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
