On 4 January 2018 at 17:55, The Wanderer <wande...@fastmail.fm> wrote:

> On 2018-01-04 at 12:30, Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> > On 4 January 2018 at 17:22, Curt <cu...@free.fr> wrote:
> >
> >> https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2018/01/meltdown-and-
> spectre-every-modern-
> >> processor-has-unfixable-security-fladdws/U
> >>
> >>
> >> TL;DR
> >>
> >>  Windows, Linux, and macOS have all received security patches that
> >>  significantly alter how the operating systems handle virtual memory in
> >>  order to protect against a hitherto undisclosed flaw.
> >> ...
> >>  In the immediate term, it looks like most systems will shortly have
> >>  patches for Meltdown. At least for Linux and Windows, these patches
> >>  allow end-users to opt out if they would prefer. The most vulnerable
> >>  users are probably cloud service providers; Meltdown and Spectre can
> >>  both in principle be used to further attacks against hypervisors,
> >>  making it easier for malicious users to break out of their virtual
> >>  machines.
> >> ...
> >>  For typical desktop users, the risk is arguably less significant. While
> >>  both Meltdown and Spectre can have value in expanding the scope of an
> >>  existing flaw, neither one is sufficient on its own to, for example,
> >>  break out of a Web browser.
> >>
> >> Apparent moral of story for CPU: don't speculate (but it's significantly
> >> *slower*).
> >
> > ​Isn't this mainly an Intel problem?  I use AMD chipsets.  I would go for
> > Ryzen nowadays anyway.
>
> Meltdown so far is not known to affect anything other than Intel.
>
> Spectre, however, is confirmed to affect AMD CPUs - and Ryzen CPUs are
> specifically stated to be affected.
>

​But if the spectre vulnerability is hard exploit in practice and  even in
artificial test situations devised e.g. in the world of Linus Torvalds then
​AMD could turn out to be relatively cyber-kosher in the end.

MF


>
> --
>    The Wanderer
>
> The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one
> persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all
> progress depends on the unreasonable man.         -- George Bernard Shaw
>
>

Reply via email to