On 2017-12-08, Jonathan Dowland <j...@debian.org> wrote: > On Fri, 2017-12-08 at 12:17 +0100, deloptes wrote: >> Michael Biebl wrote: >> >> > Basically, it was a completely inconsistent mess before systemd. >> > Now you at least have a central place where you can configure your >> > system behaviour. >> >> This is your opinion - if you can not understand the "mess" it is a >> mess. >> For most of us who dislike systemd your same statement is valid. I do >> not >> understand it and it is a mess. So we have 1:1 :) >> Perhaps we like the old mess better than the new mess ;-) >> >> Please do not try to impose your opinion on others. Free software is >> free >> for this reason and we want to stay like this. We respect each others >> opinion. > > I think you are allowing your dislike of systemd to cloud the truth of > Michael's statement. >
The OP was flameware. Nobody's embarrassed; there is no bug; nothing is "in systemd." There was a policy decision. Thus denuded of inflationary rhetoric the OP boils down to a parental guidance problem (joke). -- "The world is full of shipping clerks who have read the Harvard Classics." — Charles Bukowski
