On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Tom Furie <t...@furie.org.uk> wrote: > Is there a reason not to switch to your backports source to stretch at > the same time as the others?
If I understand correctly doing that I will end up with the ZFS packages for unstable (Debian 10) after running a dist-upgrade? Is my understanding correct? Currently I have the following packages from jessie-backports: ii dh-python 2.20170125~bpo8+1 all Debian helper tools for packaging Python libraries and applications ii dkms 2.3-2~bpo8+1 all Dynamic Kernel Module Support Framework ii libnvpair1linux 0.6.5.9-2~bpo8+1 amd64 Solaris name-value library for Linux ii libuutil1linux 0.6.5.9-2~bpo8+1 amd64 Solaris userland utility library for Linux ii libzfs2linux 0.6.5.9-2~bpo8+1 amd64 OpenZFS filesystem library for Linux ii libzpool2linux 0.6.5.9-2~bpo8+1 amd64 OpenZFS pool library for Linux ii spl 0.6.5.9-1~bpo8+1 amd64 Solaris Porting Layer user-space utilities for Linux ii spl-dkms 0.6.5.9-1~bpo8+1 all Solaris Porting Layer kernel modules for Linux ii zfs-dkms 0.6.5.9-2~bpo8+1 all OpenZFS filesystem kernel modules for Linux ii zfs-zed 0.6.5.9-2~bpo8+1 amd64 OpenZFS Event Daemon ii zfsutils-linux 0.6.5.9-2~bpo8+1 amd64 command-line tools to manage OpenZFS filesystems