-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 03:39:58AM +0100, Emanuel Berg wrote: > Doug wrote: > > > I do not disparage the hard work some devs > > have put into Linux CAD routines, but I don't > > think that's the way to go if you're going to > > do some serious CAD work over the course > > of time. > > ... why not?
Because that's what Autodesk wants you to believe. For those of us around a little longer, perhaps you remember that time when GNU/Linux started to get some traction. At that time, Microsoft used to say that well, an OS wasn't that hard, but for something really complex like a web browser... the free software couldn't really pull that off. Shortly thereafter Mozilla smashed Internet Explorer into the ground. Closed software vendors want you to believe that Professional (TM) is only possible as proprietary software, and some people (hi, Doug: no offense intended) swallow this bait, including hook and sinker (after all, closed software vendors put "some" money into that, as part of their publicity operation). This is one of the most damaging mechanisms to free software these days. Vendors have become much more subtle: watch Microsoft deploying Linux in their cloud and trumpeting "We love Open Source[1]" -- behind the scenes they are massaging decision makers[2] to fear the GPL (because this one has teeth). Pretty disgusting, actually :-( Cheers [1] See? They don't want Free Software. They don't want you, the user, to be free -- they just want a free ride. [2] If necessary wining and dining them, to the tune of $$$ - -- tomás -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAloXxPMACgkQBcgs9XrR2kbrIwCbBLuEL7ULpsblXMH5d9HkP++E vWYAnAo1HQov0ofroulQHttusD0FLZ3n =RO8T -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
