On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 at 10:22 GMT, Scott Ehrlich penned: > Yes: > > more /etc/default/spamassassin # /etc/default/spamd.conf # Duncan > Findlay # November 2001 > > # WARNING read README.spamd before using. THERE ARE SECURITY RISKS! > > # Change to one to enable spamd ENABLED=1 > > # Options # See man spamd for possible options. The -d option is > automatically added. OPTIONS="-c" #OPTIONS="-F 0" > > > I've reviewed my procmail log file many times and there are _no_ hints > as to what is going on. At one point, verbose=yes had exim returning > a message to the sending host, as a mailer-daemon notification, simply > saying procmail was running, but no error. I turned verbose=off and > that stopped happening. > > Scott
(Please don't top post.) Maybe I'm being pedantic, but do you see it in ps? Here's what I see: # ps -eaf | grep spamd root 27187 1 0 Oct24 ? 00:00:17 /usr/sbin/spamd -m 10 -d --pidfile=/var/run/spamd.pid Also, I'm not sure which "verbose" you're referencing, but when I set VERBOSE=yes in my .procmailrc, I see the following in my procmail log: procmail: Executing "/usr/bin/spamc" -- monique -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
