Brian wrote: > [...] > That's a good idea, but thinking on: there two ends to the connection, > the printer and the sending device. Fixing printers is unlikely to be > high on vendors' lists of priorities, but a fix is available when the > sending device uses Debian. Isn't it sufficient to fix one end of the > connection to dispose of the vulnerability? >
KRACK is an attack against the *client* side. It MUST (rfc2119) be that device that is patched against the attack. -- |_|O|_| Registered Linux user #585947 |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
