On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Tom wrote:
... > > > I have this belief that for any arbitrary large block of code, the # of > > > undiscovered root exploits to be very large (I actually beleve the # to > > > be limitless -- humans are infinitely clever). > > > > I have this belief that the moon is made out of green cheese and that > > all the good ones are dead. > > > > Care to state the basis for your belief, or its relevance to reality? > > I said it's intuition. Intution is not logic. It is not proof. It is > not intended to be proof. Which makes responding to the rest of your > arguments pointless. > > We'll see whose right :-) "buggs" usually exists because of: - there are many other (code or living) stuff to do - silly marketing/sales deadlines - lazyness - boredom to write/rewirte/review the same code - no automated way to definitively say "this is a problem" - people process/proceedure for using the same code varies - some folks are better than others at "breaking in" - people are not as meticulous as needed - people's "convenience vs security" will always highlight/amplify exploitable vunlnerabilities and in this case, what one doesn't know will hurt one day <forecast> - using dhcp, wireless, work-at-home, laptops will be the cause of most of the "vulnerabilities" and breakins - it is no longer bugs in the code aa much as it used to be </forecast> - usually nothing you can do to "prevent sw buggs"... - hopefully, easy to prevent buggs/exploits are all taken care of fun stuff .... keeping the "baby covered and protected" .. c ya alvin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]