On Thursday, August 03, 2017 08:23:37 AM Nicolas George wrote: > Even worse, the anti-aliasing is done wrong: > it is done without taking gamma correction into account. That means that > when 50% intensity is wanted, it produces 22% intensity instead: > black-on-white is too thick, white-on-black is too thin.
Thank you for confirming something I suspected for a long time. Do you know what program(s) is responsibe for the anti-aliasing, against which a bug might be filed (or maybe a bug has already been filed)?
