On Mon, 8 May 2017 13:20:18 +0530 Ashok Inder <ashoka.inder....@gmail.com> wrote:
> :With Uget > Have a look at the attachments, Randomly downloaded a file, 87mb file > turned out to be 91mb file. As you've discovered from the other responses, that size difference is just a matter of the size units used. What's important: Does uget satisfy your definition of a "decent' download manager? Does it do what you need it to do? B > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:* Patrick Bartek <mailto:nemomm...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Monday, May 08, 2017 7:15AM > *To:* Debian-user <mailto:debian-user@lists.debian.org> > *Subject:* Re: Download Manager > > > > > > On Sun, 7 May 2017 23:37:53 +0530 Ashok Inder > <ashoka.inder....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > For past 7 years, Linux does not have a single descent Download > > Manager. Its totally possible that none of you may have faced this > > issue ever but its a somewhat major issue for me... > > > > First with WGET, I'm not at all comfortable with cli, the other > > being [big rant snipped] > > I guess, it depends on what you mean by "decent." Take a look at > uget. It's GUI-based and besides its other features, has Mozilla > Firefox integration. Or load synaptic and do some searches. No > commandline knowledge needed. > > B > >
