Lisi Reisz schreef op 01-01-2017 13:00:
On Sunday 01 January 2017 11:52:20 Xen wrote:
Lisi Reisz schreef op 31-12-2016 10:30:
> Which make me bad at writing?
>
> Lisi
Refusing to write good documentation on purpose.
"%(&_++**!&
And what is that supposed to mean? You are really acting like a child
now.
The fact is that you want Linux to remain for experts only. Catherine
almost literally expressed such a sentiment. That the "noobs" have to
leave their "noobish mindsets" behind if they want to use Linux. Nuf
said?
Yes and I make a fool of myself here but I was late to the party in any
case. That stuff happens, then.
Which you probably don't realize but if you respond to a thread you
don't have the messages of, bad stuff always happens ;-). You just lack
the basis to participate in full and your arguments will be as a
consequence always lacking.
So call me a lackey then here.
Catherine's only argument is in the end that the system was designed to
be a reference only. Is what she says. I don't even know if it is true.
But that is in the past, and the past should never be allowed, or be
able to, in any sense, to preclude the possibility and right to improve.
A decision in the past should never mandate a decision in the future, or
in the present. Citing the past as the reason for not changing a thing
is just defunct.
That means you HAVE no arguments for not changing a thing because the
past it is not an argument, it is just a truth, a fact of life.
It was designed in a certain way in the past. So what? We are in the
present now. We create the future. We cannot be shackled by the past,
ever.
That is the whole point of proposing something new.
If your only response to a NEW thing is the status quo of an OLD thing,
then sorry, you have no arguments left.
