On 07/12/16 14:42, Jape Person wrote: > I'll never forget hearing someone trying to prop an early version of > Netscape up by saying that it was a good browser *because* it failed on > badly written pages.
It shouldn't crash, of course, but I think the web would be a much nicer place if browsers just refused to render broken pages, rather than potentially displaying them in a misleading way. That's one of the reason I'm sad xhtml seems to have been at least partly abandoned - the rules of xml say you should just give up if it isn't valid. That would mean web devs would have to fix their mess. Richard
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
