> On Nov 13, 2016, at 5:19 PM, Pascal Hambourg <pas...@plouf.fr.eu.org> wrote: > >> Le 13/11/2016 à 22:27, Henning a écrit : >> I followed this thread and i wonder if there is a sane reason why you do nat >> inside your network. Why don't you just route between different subnets i.e. >> 10.0.1.0/24 and 10.0.2.0/24 > > Probably because the modem and hosts in 10.0.0.0/24 don't know about > 192.168.40.0/24. >
And usually there is no reason for two separate rfc1918 address ranges. Pick one matching your address space needs and design subnets. There is only one single reason for nat: you have more hosts than routable ip addresses. I guess 10.0.0.0 meets even the biggest organizations. -H
