Hi Glenn,

On Sat, 12 Nov 2016 08:50:46 -0700
Glenn English <ghe2...@gmail.com> wrote:

...

>
>It never occurred to me that something might be looking at aliases; I thought 
>the IP
>address was the important thing. And the srv...dmz entry is commented out 
>because I
>thought it might somehow be used.
>
>I'll remove all mentions of srv (and lots of others to make it shorter) and 
>see. 
>
>The hosts file is now:
>
>> root@srv:~# cat /etc/hosts
>> # /etc/hosts:  This file describes a number of hostname-to-address
>> #
>> # This is to be sent to all hosts that need a hosts file
>> #    (don't really know how yet...)
>> #  
>> # Host Database
>> # localhost is used to configure the loopback interface
>> # sudo cp hosts /etc ; dist `pwd`/hosts /etc all hosts
>> # The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts
>> # when the system is booting.  Do not change this entry.
>> #       
>> ::1          ip6-localhost                   ip6-loopback
>> fe00::0              ip6-localnet
>> ff00::0      ip6-mcastprefix
>> ff02::1      ip6-allnodes
>> ff02::2      ip6-allrouters
>> ff02::3      ip6-allhosts
>> 
>> 127.0.0.1    localhost localhost.localdomain lh lcl
>> 
>> # pass I slsware.org -- all routable IPs; no NAT
>> 216.17.203.64        slsware.org
>> 216.17.203.65        out.slsware.org         oso
>> 216.17.203.66        srv.slsware.org         sso

This might be your problem??                   ^^^^^
I suspect the above line should be:

216.17.203.66   srv.slsware.org         srv

with the last field matching the hostname.
-Jason


>> 216.17.203.67        gobook.slsware.org      gso gbo
>> 216.17.203.68        unused0.slsware.org     u0so
>> 216.17.203.69        unused1.slsware.org     u1so
>> 216.17.203.70        printer.slsware.org     pso
>> 216.17.203.71        broadcast.slsware.org   bso
>> 
>> # misc ne'r-do-wells
>> 127.0.0.2       ad.doubleclick.net
>> 127.0.0.2       mmv.admob.com
>
>The *only* mention of srv is with the right domain and the right IP.
>
>After a reboot:
>
>> root@srv:~# hostname
>> srv
>> root@srv:~# hostname -f
>> hostname: Name or service not known
>
>And just in case it's the IP:
>
>> root@srv:~# ifconfig
>> eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:25:90:d5:16:34  
>>          inet addr:216.17.203.66  Bcast:216.17.203.71  Mask:255.255.255.248
>>          inet6 addr: fe80::225:90ff:fed5:1634/64 Scope:Link
>>          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>>          RX packets:459 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>          TX packets:470 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 
>>          RX bytes:47597 (46.4 KiB)  TX bytes:49637 (48.4 KiB)
>>          Interrupt:16 Memory:fbce0000-fbd00000 
>> 
>> eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:25:90:d5:16:35  
>>          inet addr:192.168.3.66  Bcast:192.168.3.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
>>          UP BROADCAST MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>>          RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>          TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 
>>          RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
>>          Interrupt:17 Memory:fbde0000-fbe00000 
>> 
>> lo        Link encap:Local Loopback  
>>          inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
>>          inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
>>          UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:65536  Metric:1
>>          RX packets:68 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>          TX packets:68 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 
>>          RX bytes:17189 (16.7 KiB)  TX bytes:17189 (16.7 KiB)
>
>And:
>
>> root@srv:~# cat /proc/sys/kernel/domainname 
>> (none)
>
>It doesn't give the www answer anymore; it must have been doing something 
>(odd) with
>hosts. But now it claims it can't find anything.
>
>> "hostname" returns what is in /etc/hostname (unless changed agfter
>> system startup).
>> 
>> "hostname -f" returns the part up to the first dot from whatever is
>> returned by resolving "hostname" against /etc/hosts.
>
>The 2 dots after resolving hostname, maybe? That does sound very reasonable, 
>but it
>doesn't seem to be working. And how does /proc get a domainname.
>

Reply via email to