On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:55:44PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 09:32:02AM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > Am I being unreasonable? You are certainly more of an expert than I - I > > suppose you find that it is quality software, and better than > > rsnapshot, despite basically being dead? > > Lack of bug and development activity is certainly a worrying sign of a program > with problems. But development activity naturally dies off if a program does > what it is supposed to do, so it's not always a certainty that it is doomed. > It remains a concern for me, but regardless the tool has worked very well. >
It looks like rdiff-backup has a new maintainer as of February 2016, sol1. See <http://rdiff-backup.org/>. There may be some progress forthcoming after all. dt -- Dave Thayer / Denver, Colorado USA / d...@thayer-boyle.com Whenever you read a good book, it's like the author is right there, in the room talking to you, which is why I don't like to read good books. - Jack Handey "Deep Thoughts"
