On Monday 04 July 2016 17:37:00 Brian wrote: > On Mon 04 Jul 2016 at 15:37:42 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Monday 04 July 2016 15:16:23 Brian wrote: > > > > It isn't. It is just a short quotation to show the ipw 2200 and the > > DRIVERS=="?*", because it bothered me that the drivers bit just had a > > question mark, but apparently my worry about that was misplaced. Whole > > file beneath my signature. > > Full quotes are always preferable. If I were in your position I'd > regenerate the file. You've possibly got at least one device there > which is not on the machine. Let the system take care of things. > > Be that as it may, you appear to have all necessary firmware and > drivers. So, how do you fancy a bit of low level stuff? > > Reboot and first check firmware loading from 'journalctl'. Then > issue the command 'wpa_cli'. > > 1. wpa-cli > You get a prompt ">". This is interactive mode. A selected > interface should be shown. TAB completion of commands works. > Command history is with the UP and DOWN keys. The following > commands are typed at the prompt. > > 2. add_network > You'll probably get 0 for the network number. > > 3. set_network 0 ssid "Your_SSID" > The response should be "OK". > > 4. set_network psk "Your_passphrase" > The response should be "OK". > > 5. enable_network 0 > The response should be "OK". Authentication and association > should take place. > > 6. status 0 > Has it?
So I did it actually on the machine, and yes the card is partly alive - we have sadly known that all along. I can paste the file if anyone is interested, but it must have become boring. It was not an actual connection: ping did not work, although I had a network 0. Ping was obviously working previously over the ethernet that was connected so that I could ssh. Doh! I'm going to try that new card when it comes. I may, of course, be wasting £6, but I also may have a little hair left still, and it may not yet have gone grey. :-( Lisi