On Tue 17 May 2016 at 16:38:52 (+0200), Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > * Gene Heskett <ghesk...@shentel.net> [2016-05-17 09:56 -0400]: > > On Tuesday 17 May 2016 09:08:55 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > [...] > > > In my opinion, a warning is in order ("this might not be doing > > > what you think it does"), but deprecated seems exaggerated to me. > > > > > > [1] Schocking Truth! Not everything seen on the Internet is true! > > > > About 4th or 5th down in that list of hits, this one labeled for debian, > > is a bit long winded but finishes up recommending one edit his > > personal .bash-aliases file to contain this: > > > > alias netrestart="sudo nohup sh -c 'invoke-rc.d networking stop; date; > > echo sleeping; sleep 2; echo waking; date; invoke-rc.d networking > > start'" > > > > Is that simple? Elegant and correct? No, if the networking script was > > broken, its still broken! > > Again, I recommend to read [0] and [1]. > > [0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=550240
My reading of this is: Problem: A doesn't work. Solution: Put message in B saying B might not work. Is that right? And is it helpful to Gene? > [1] > https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PredictableNetworkInterfaceNames/ I'm not sure what this has to do with the problem in hand. Cheers, David.