On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 20:47, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 16:05:38 -0600, > Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 02:30, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > > On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 00:52:47 -0600, > > > Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 00:18, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > [snip] > > > > > ..what stops Sissy Boy George from launching a "preventive" > > > > > strike to prevent an indictment for war crimes > > > > > > > > Nuke The Netherlands? <snicker> Better to nuke France, and have > > > > the fall-out drift over The Hague. > > > > > > ..the Serb propaganda shills called this the kanguroo court, during > > > the recent Balkan wars. With Slobodan Milosevic getting just 40 > > > years, it appears they were right. > > > > > and treason under US Law? > > > > > > > > Since you invoke US law, you need to know that a sitting President > > > > can only be tried for treason by the US Congress. Maybe he could > > > > nuke DC? > > > > > > ..maybe. ;-) > > > > > > ..and you forgot he is the Supreme Commander and can be tried > > > in DC for war crimes, too. In Texas, he signed off how many? ;-) > > > > How many war crimes did he sign off on as governor of Texas? > > Zero, of course. > > ..ah, Slobo's Shill Dance. ;-) I tried to hint towards the number of > death row inmates he signed off for execution. How many? ;-)
Slobo's Shill Dance? Yes, I knew what you were hinting at. However, public trials with juries of "peers" with convictions for capital offenses, with sentences meted out by those same juries can hardly be called war crimes. Maybe you can convince me that capital punishment is barbarous, morally wrong, and should be abolished, but not that it's a war crime. And thus concludes this threadlet. > > > > Of course, if he were a lawyer, then he could be disbarred, like > > > > the Arkansas Bar Association did to W's predecessor, while he was > > > > still in office. > > > > > > > > http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/10/01/politics/main313109.shtml > > > > > > .._any_ War Commander can be "disbarred" for war crimes, > > > treason and incompetence and even for being a sissy. ;-) > > > > I guess you don't know what "disbar" means. > > > > <DEFINITION> > > $ dict disbar > > 2 definitions found > > > > From The Collaborative International Dictionary of English v.0.48 > > [gcide]: > > > > Disbar \Dis*bar"\, v. t. [imp. & p. p. {Disbarred}; p. pr. & vb. > > n. {Disbarring}.] (Law) > > To expel from the bar, or the legal profession; to deprive > > (an attorney, barrister, or counselor) of his status and > > privileges as such. --Abbott. > > [1913 Webster] > > > > From WordNet (r) 2.0 (August 2003) [wn]: > > > > disbar > > v : remove from the bar; expel from the practice of law by > > official action; "The corrupt lawyer was disbarred" > > </DEFINITION> > > .. ;-) It appears you missed the meaning of _"_ disbarred _"_. ;-) > > > So, "War Commanders" aren't disbarred. > > .."disbarred". ;-) Funny, I learned otherwise in boot school. ;-) You can try "War Commanders" for lots of things, but disbarment is a civil penalty, not a criminal manner. > > And calling someone a sissy every other email is just plain bad > > form, > > ..I respectfully disagree: http://awolbush.com/ > http://www.google.com/search?q=%22George+W.+Bush%22+AWOL The repetition is still bad form. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jefferson, LA USA The difference between drunken sailors and Congressmen is that drunken sailors spend their own money. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
