On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 07:53:47PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Friday 29 April 2016 18:33:07 Stephen Allen wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 06:33:33PM -0700, Marc Shapiro wrote: > > > On 04/27/2016 04:21 PM, Stephen Allen wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:26:36PM -0700, Marc Shapiro wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, it came right back. It shows as being 'Read', but it's > > > > > > > there. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > > > > You're reading the 'All Mail' Gmail directory that's why. > > > > > > Copies don't come back to one's regular inbox, but will be in > > > > > > the all mail directory if my memory serves me. By default > > > > > > Gmail won't show them in the inbox in their Webmail Gmail or > > > > > > INBOX app. Using IMAP on mutt I don't see them either unless I > > > > > > enter the all mail directory. > > > > > > Actually, no. > > > > > > I let Gmail do my filtering and all of the list's mail gets filtered > > > into a separate folder. My posts show up there. > > > > You're telling me you put your sent mail in that folder too via a > > ruleset? Why do you want to see your sent email? > > I dunno what planet you are on, but I want to see my post coming back > from the list server to prove that the post made it to the list. With > gmail, the only practical way to do that is to subscribe using two > different names, and always send to only one, but you will then get the > list echo back on the 2nd account. Its a PITA with gmail, but its the > only way I know of to get around their duplicate deletion. Then gmail > changed the login about a year ago, so mine failed and I took that > server off my every 3 minute scan for new mail. And I don't miss the > headache of dealing with gmail as it reduces my pain killer input by > 99%.
The list is archived online, if you're unsure about it getting to the list one can see it that way. Email is returned if it's undeliverable.
