On 21/04/2016 5:44 AM, John L. Ries wrote: >> Thanks! I think we need to share more examples on how to use systemd >> properly. A lot of the criticism stems from the simple fact that people >> just need to learn what the new tools can do for them. > > That would be an indication that systemd is non-intuitive and poorly > documented, which has been my impression for the past several years. > There may be no good cure for the former (but a better systemadm would > help), but there is for the latter.
Agreed on the responder part. There is little that more examples of systemd will encourage anything for me; it is not the way *nix systems should be built. There is definitely far too much reach and over creep in systemd already, with more to come. Sadly this software version of cancer is planned to keep spreading. :( AndrewM
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
