On Tue 15 Mar 2016 at 05:30:28 (+0300), Adam Wilson wrote: > On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 19:50:15 +0000 Brian <a...@cityscape.co.uk> wrote: > > > On Tue 15 Mar 2016 at 06:00:27 +1100, Andrew McGlashan wrote: > > > > > On 15/03/2016 5:13 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > > On Monday 14 March 2016 14:06:27 Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote: > > > > > > > >> IMHO its worth to try the web without flash. > > > >> HTML5 can do a lot nowadays. > > > >> And visiting sites without using flash helps to get rid of it. > > > > > > The sooner, the better.... Flash needs to die ASAP. > > > > Total nonsense. > > This is a very silly position. Of course *one person* declining to use > Flash isn't going to change anything- but that one person can influence > others to do so, and then others will boycott Flash, etc. How is it > that positive systemic changes are made in the real world? By the > action of the masses, and the action of the masses starts with the > action of individuals. > > Nothing would ever happen if everyone adopted the logic of "oh well, I'm > alone so I can't change anything". The journey of a thousand miles > starts with a single step. > > > Does it even notice you didn't even visit its site? "By God", they > > say, Brian didn't watch Happy Valley; why not?; we must do something > > about this. > > They will notice when lots of people no longer use Flash, and we will > force them to react accordingly. >
Please stop trolling on this list. Cheers, David.
