Peter,

You shouldn't be confused: there will always be people of limited
intelligence and understanding who will find offence in any statement,
picture, opinion or attitude that does not conform to their severely
restricted mind-set.

There is nothing to be found on the internet that transcends the barbarity
of certain groups that rape , murder, mutilate and gloat over their
actions, and post their obscene videos to the world, to compare with the
images that are  complained about here.

Perhaps certain people need a reality check, and  professional
reorientation help to rejoin the real world.

Wishing you a happy new year, but doubting it will be, given the human
obstacles to progress,

Saki

On 1 January 2016 at 16:23, <pe...@berghold.net> wrote:

> I'm confused what specifically is meriting censorship?
>
> Sent from my android device.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ric Moore <wayward4...@gmail.com>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Sent: Fri, 01 Jan 2016 11:21
> Subject: Re: sexist content in the package openclipart2-png
>
> On 01/01/2016 04:47 AM, Joel Rees wrote:
>   I looked at the first twenty or so
> > images in the list, and I agree that the general point of view is very
> > much one that treats people as objects. I would not want my children
> > finding those when looking for clipart.
> >
> > In my opinion, a complaint is justified here. Those should be sorted
> > out into a separate package, at minimum.
>
> I looked at the first 100 and found nothing meriting censorship. Ric
>
>
> --
> My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
> "There are two Great Sins in the world...
> ..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity.
> Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad.
> http://linuxcounter.net/user/44256.html
>
>

Reply via email to