On 2015-09-21, rlhar...@oplink.net <rlhar...@oplink.net> wrote: > > Sans-serif is not a desirable attribute, except for certain applications > such as newspaper headlines. Studies have shown that serif fonts are more > readable and less fatiguing, because the serifs of a letter or numeral > convey much information.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frutiger_%28typeface%29 "Frutiger (pronounced with a hard g) is a series of typefaces named after its Swiss designer, Adrian Frutiger. Frutiger is a humanist sans-serif typeface, intended to be clear and highly legible at a distance or at small text sizes. A very popular design worldwide, font designer Steve Matteson described its structure as "the best choice for legibility in pretty much any situation" at small text sizes, while Erik Spiekermann named it as "the best general typeface ever"." > But Americans crave novelty, so there always is a market for the > "different" when it is claimed to be "new" and "improved". Oh jesus, kept this nationalistic bullshit out of the group, would ya fella?