Op 09-09-15 om 12:04 schreef Lisi Reisz: > On Wednesday 09 September 2015 09:34:11 Paul van der Vlis wrote: >>> Neither of these works with British 4oD or Channel 5. >> >> I cannot recieve that here I expect, and I have no URL. So I cannot test >> it, but I think you are wrong. > > How can you possibly have a valid opinion when you can't test it?
It's my job for the last 15 years. > It is you > who are wrong. Everyone here, who can in theory get it, has problems on > Linux, which the channel acknowledges. Ah, so it has nothing to do with the choice between flashplayer-mozilla and flashplugin-nonfree? That was my opinion about. Yes, a channel can implement flash in such a bad way, that it's not possible to look at it normally for Linux users. E.g. here: http://www.ookjij.nl/ But this works: http://www.ookjij.nl/index_win.html > Even flashplayer-mozilla is still not working on my husband's desktop. flashplayer-mozilla will install the same flashplayer as flashplugin-nonfree. But there is a big difference between the flashplayer what't installed in Chromium. Chromium is better in flash. For security reasons I don't use flash anymore on my work-computer. What I see there, is that really many sites use HTML5 when there is no flash available. I think this is because of tablet-computers. On tablets is no flash available. With regards, Paul van der Vlis. -- Paul van der Vlis Linux systeembeheer Groningen https://www.vandervlis.nl/
