On Sun, 2 Aug 2015 22:01:54 -0500 rlhar...@oplink.net wrote: > In Jessie, /etc/alternatives invokes "mutt-patched" in response to the > command "mutt". > > After several frustrating years using a web-based mail client, I am > returning to Mutt. But must I start with Mutt-Patched? Is there > anything wrong (including lack of maintenance) with the original > Mutt? and is the original still available in the Debian archive? > > rlh > > mutt-patched: This package adds the following patches:
* sidebar: list mailboxes (with new mail) in a separate column on screen * nntp: NNTP support for mutt * multiple-fcc: handle FCC with multiple, comma separated entries /debmirror/pool/main/m/mutt# ls mutt-dbg_1.5.21-6.2+deb7u3_amd64.deb mutt-dbg_1.5.21-6.2+deb7u3_i386.deb mutt-dbg_1.5.23-3_amd64.deb mutt-dbg_1.5.23-3_i386.deb mutt-patched_1.5.21-6.2+deb7u3_amd64.deb mutt-patched_1.5.21-6.2+deb7u3_i386.deb mutt-patched_1.5.23-3_amd64.deb mutt-patched_1.5.23-3_i386.deb mutt_1.5.21.orig.tar.gz mutt_1.5.21-6.2+deb7u3.diff.gz mutt_1.5.21-6.2+deb7u3.dsc mutt_1.5.21-6.2+deb7u3_amd64.deb mutt_1.5.21-6.2+deb7u3_i386.deb mutt_1.5.23.orig.tar.gz mutt_1.5.23-3.debian.tar.xz mutt_1.5.23-3.dsc mutt_1.5.23-3_amd64.deb mutt_1.5.23-3_i386.deb Hope this helps -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150803051659.042b3a50@fx4100
