Hello. Please compare: https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/libc6-dbg/filelist
with the following: https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/libqt4-dbg/filelist https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/qtbase5-dbg/filelist https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/kdelibs5-dbg/filelist https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/libkf5guiaddons5-dbg/filelist https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/libkf5coreaddons5-dbg/filelist The libc6 debug package clearly shows the actual file names of the SO-s from which the debug symbols where extracted so that for instance even though I find: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu $ nm libm.so nm: libm.so: no symbols I can go to the identically named directory under /usr/lib/debug and: /usr/lib/debug/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu $ nm -C libm-2.19.so | grep sincos 0000000000027530 W sincos 0000000000027530 t __sincos 0000000000034d80 W sincosf 0000000000034d80 t __sincosf 000000000003f950 W sincosl 000000000003f950 t __sincosl 00000000000aafe0 r __sincosl_table 00000000000ade20 r __sincostab Clearly the Qt/KDE libs' debug symbols files should also have similar meaningful names identical to the actual SO files from which these symbols have been stripped, but there is probably some bug in the Debian builder scripts which automatically pull the git from upstream repo and builds it, or something like that, causing names to be similar to git blob file names. I do not have enough knowledge of Debian build system to identify the correct package to file the bug against. Please tell me if the bug is already filed too. (I tried to use the search interface but trying to "include bugs with" "debug symbols have unreadable names" did not work correctly.) Thanks. BTW I'm not subscribed to this list so I request being CC-ed on this thread. -- Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cah-hcwwf9odt-rgl0fzb3dh47gvwzb7rafwitg_zv4k3qar...@mail.gmail.com
