On Wed, 24 Jun 2015, Seeker wrote: > > > On 6/24/2015 3:58 PM, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:47:27 -0700 > > Seeker <seeker5...@comcast.net> wrote: > > > >> Paranoia is the foundation of paranoia, fueled by those who would > >> prevent others from having a choice of using systemd. > > No-one wants to prevent others from having a choice of using > > systemd; what some people want is the freedom not to use it > > themselves. > > > That choice never went away. It just requires reading the release > notes and following the relevant instructions > in the release notes.
People are too use to having everything done for them to consider READING. Maybe, if the Release Notes were in video format, or an app on their phone. ;-) > There were those few squeeky wheels leading up to, and following the > decision to make systemd the default. > > [snip] I consider the systemd decision rushed, and its inclusion in Jessie as the default init premature. It lacked maturity. At least, for Debian. It should have been delayed one development cycle, at least, but made available for Jessie as an option for user evaluation and feedback before the final decision. But when you have major OS components and applications that have systemd parts (not necessarily the init part) as dependencies, what choices do you have? When I look back on all this, I wonder: Who got bribed and by whom? B -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150625092301.3754b...@debian7.boseck208.net
