On 6/23/15, to...@tuxteam.de <to...@tuxteam.de> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 06:24:52PM +0530, rajiv chavan wrote: >> Tue, 23 Jun 2015 18:16:51 +0530 >> >> Is calculation memory/cpu cycle intensive? >> Consider a faster (and multi-core) processor with more cache? > > Agreed -- but I think you wanted to reply to list or to the original > poster, Dan. > > regards > - -- t > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAlWJjlEACgkQBcgs9XrR2kZHxQCfaeDakuB+6QOlYLS8nkQ9DNae > q84An3xu7OoKkfTSrpdyRL+Nbj8ApCyI > =/S4F > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > Thank you Tomas.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/calm+mzs8urxfwkgvzkqbhd3o_eoq_bccgu8vtj1-_pn2q2h...@mail.gmail.com
