On 2015-04-22 23:30:49 -0500, David Wright wrote: > Quoting Vincent Lefevre (vinc...@vinc17.net): > > On 2015-04-21 10:35:12 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: > > > Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > > So, there's still something I don't understand: after dropping the > > > > caches, why is Mutt fast to read the mailbox (about 1 minute), but > > > > not my tool (about 30 minutes)? > > > > > > Are you using mutt's header_cache feature? It keeps a cache of mail > > > files off to the side. It really improves Maildir performance. I > > > personally also have maildir_header_cache_verify=no set too. > > > > No, I don't use it. This variable doesn't even exist with my compiled > > version. > > OK, I'll ask. What *is* your version?
This is in my headers: Mutt/1.5.23-6425-vl-r76280 (2015-03-04) i.e. based on the hg repo + some patches. The variables are mentioned by the generated manual, but are not available, probably because I don't configure Mutt with --enable-hcache (with my current use of Mutt, I don't really need it, and it's safer without it). -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150423082641.gc24...@xvii.vinc17.org
