On Tuesday 14 April 2015 20:11:30 Brian wrote: > On Tue 14 Apr 2015 at 15:32:47 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 01:09:46PM -0500, David Wright wrote: > > > Quoting Brian (a...@cityscape.co.uk): > > > > On Mon 13 Apr 2015 at 12:00:52 -0500, David Wright wrote: > > > > … > > > > > > > So the most I could do is set up an account just to write "This > > > > > list entry may mislead you" on the page. > > > > … > > > > > > You could do better than that :). It took half a minute to discover > > > > that the "GNOME accessibility" entry needs removing or the entry > > > > adjusted to reflect what version of Debian it applies to. Following > > > > the link is sufficient to see why. > > > > I've fixed the gnome-core definition on that page in less time than it > > took to read any of the last three messages in this sub-thread, and > > therefore certainly less time than it took to write them, using only > > information gleaned from posts in this thread. In other words, any one of > > you could have done it just as well. > > There is no arguing with that; we are pleased you found the information > useful. This is an excellent example illustrating how the interaction > between Debian users leads to a change and an improvement.
Yes, but it now needs something about accessibility. Accessibility is one of Gnome's strengths, and as this site was before it only took a click on the provided link to get all the information. I think that the change is detrimental. Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/201504142205.41541.lisi.re...@gmail.com
