-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 18/02/2015 8:40 PM, Richard Hector wrote: > On 17/02/15 23:40, Karl E. Jorgensen wrote: >> I also ended up with systemd - which I was also somewhat >> sceptical about. But since I could not come up with any >> technically sound arguments against it (partially caused by my >> ignorance of systemd), I decided to take the leap - if nothing >> else, to be able to honestly criticize it and actually know what >> I was talking about. > > On 18/02/15 20:29, Andrew McGlashan wrote: >> You couldn't even bring yourself to say systemd, what's wrong >> with saying it? > > He did, actually. And described constructive motives.
Yes, but the first paragraph he said "system ," .... A. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iF4EAREIAAYFAlTkY6oACgkQqBZry7fv4vu4KgD8DaimHWFCyNmPbjwyH73gCeCa UKuPmBF6y733mRgLPXABAIF9aqMdPZgnnNq1wJ2sMO6e6MEIpRua4WwqtbW5CxdR =y5oJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54e463ab.5090...@affinityvision.com.au
