On Monday 16 February 2015 14:41:32 Christian Kastner wrote:
> On 2015-02-16 13:47, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Christian Seiler <christ...@iwakd.de> 
wrote:
> >> Am 16.02.2015 um 02:54 schrieb Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton:
> >>> http://lkcl.net/reports/removing_systemd_from_debian/
> >>
> >> It's funny that when Wheezy (not Jessie!) came out, nobody complained
> >> that libsystemd-login0 (which is now part of libsystemd0) was as a
> >> dependency of dbus, so it is probably already installed on most desktop
> >> systems running current Debian stable.
> >
> >  i'll hazard a guess that it's because they had no idea that, in the
> > very near future, all the major desktop developers and all the major
> > distros would make the unilateral decision to hard-code the
> > *exclusive* use of systemd (or parts of it).
>
> I'll hazard another guess, namely that the great vast majority of users
> simply do not care. I'd be surprised if most users even know what an
> init system does, much less what the differences between sysvinit /
> systemd / upstart / etc are. [*]

>
> [*] Anecdotal: the result of a quick poll among 4 Linux users in my
> immediate vicinity had just this result.

Ditto.  But 3.

Lisi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/201502161509.15971.lisi.re...@gmail.com

Reply via email to