On 01/12/2015 01:00 AM, Ric Moore wrote:
On 01/11/2015 06:47 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
Iain M Conochie wrote:
These increase in security as you go higher up the number. So (assuming the
implementation is secure) my fingerprint (being something I am) is more
secure than a password. Also, an ssh-key (being something I have) is more
secure than a password.
Concerning fingerprints and other biometrics for security...
I am sorry to disclose that our site had a security breach.
Please change your fingerprints to a new secure fingerprint before
using the site.
Hmm... I think I would much rather change my password.
If you don't wear gloves, you leave your fingerprints all over the place. And,
as you mention, you can't change them. :) Ric
Interestingly, a few years ago I took out a joint deposit box account with my daughter.
The "bank"--a credit union--
uses fingerprints--but not ours. Neither of us could get their machine to
record our fingerprints! And no, neither
of us is a safecracker!
--doug
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54b36d8b.4090...@optonline.net
