Joel Rees wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > the disk as physical volumes for lvm. For you I might suggest: > > > > /dev/sdb1 /boot {256M} > > /dev/sdb4 extended {remainder} > > Why extended? I generally put my LVM partition straight in a DOS > primary partition, unless I needed more than three non-LVM partitions > for some reason.
The original poster already had it as an extended partition. I was simply editing their original listing to fit. Here is the original poster's listing. >>> /dev/sdb1 / (root) {7G} >>> /dev/sdb2 /swap {4GB} >>> /dev/sdb3 /oldjunk {1G} >>> /dev/sdb4 extended {remainder} >>> /dev/sdb5 LVM {one large volume} Therefore when I cut down that listing I simply left that part as it was since I didn't think it mattered. They were using an unusual format for describing the partitions and I didn't want to be too disruptive of it thinking that it must be the way they liked it. And since that detail wasn't significant I didn't change it. Personally I tend to have more than four partitions. Therefore I will almost always end up using extended partitions. And so I have gotten into the habit of always using them. No other reason. I do try to keep /boot as simple as possible and therefore do actively try to always have /boot on /dev/sda1 as a simple ext2 file system without lvm. I understand more complicated configurations work now but they haven't always and keeping it simple for /boot has always made things easier for me when there has been system trouble and debugging needed. Bob
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature